IndyMedia - Vrij Media Centrum Nederland

How about you directly quote a claim I made that you consider "conspiracy theories about all kinds of groeps without proper foundation" and we'll discuss that? You just calling proven accusations (such as of fundraising for members of fascist militia groups or of hiding such information from the people asked to donate) as "conspiracy theories" doesn't make it so.

Well? You've defended your decisions by baselessly accusing me of posting "conspiracy theories" and then failing to provide even a single quote to back it up. Either put up or retract.

In the meantime, through my posts you've already been informed years ago (in detail!) about things like Petrovichev's engagement in the OUN or Samoylenko's engagement in the Right Sector, yet you've simply moved all this information to Ruis without providing a reason. While at the same time you continued to allow your site to be used to elicit donations by appealing to these very same characters, with appeals that continued to hide this very information from the people who are asked to donate. Trying to get people's money under false pretenses seems to be a recurring theme for some self-proclaimed "anarchist" groups, see Sjerp's text where he reported on the same thing happening to him (though apparently he did get his money back, while my open question Q2 to Vrije Bond from several years ago remains unanswered: https://www.indymedia.nl/node/52304).

Are the people who run this site perhaps members of Vrije Bond themselves? The Athens Indymedia has regular accountability processes, when was the last time you had any sort of accountability process?

What is it with all this essentialist stuff anyway? Are you lot even capable of arguing the actual content of positions instead of just churning out essentialist quips (Sjerp *is* a "crazy zionist", Abtin *is* a "manarchist rapist", ...)? What I said is that I agreed with (part of) the content of their arguments. This is still supposed to be an anarchist movement instead of a bunch of little kids on a playground playing clique games about who is "linked" with who and what not, isn't it?

As for choosing who I do or don't associate with, I have seen exactly zero evidence of Sjerp being a Zionist. He himself told me that this is nothing but a hate campaign because he is jewish. And I am inclined to believe him, since this very website does indeed call on people to incite ethnic hatred against minorities,[1] with the same call having been published on the Vrije Bond website by the secretariat: https://www.vrijebond.org/first-international-day-of-commemoration-of-th...

So yes, I will happily associate with Sjerp and not with Vrije Bond or the people who run Indymedia, for a simple reason:
- There is zero evidence of Sjerp being a zionist.
- There is clear evidence of Vrije Bond calling on people to incite ethnic hatred.
- There is clear evidence of Indymedia calling on people to incite ethnic hatred.

1. In particular there is a text (https://www.indymedia.nl/node/54602) on this website calling on people to follow in the footsteps of Sergey Petrovichech, claiming that this is the "way to freedom." And as we know (https://indymedia.nl/node/54833) one of Sergey's first footsteps, around the time of the Russian anti-Caucasian riots in 2011, was joining a neo-nazi hooligan group in Ulyanovsk and getting himself convicted for inciting ethnic hatred. (it was already pointed out to you that this text, for this and other similar reasons, violates publication rules on fascist content. No action was taken, and as usual any text or comment critical of it gets instantly thrown in Ruis even though they do not violate publication rules)